Skip to main content

Remove Underline-text option from WYSIWYG editor

Underlined text is a specific message to the typesetter to italicize any underlined text when printing. Underlining should never be seen in a publication. Underlined text is harder to read. On a webpage, underlined text is confusing to the user - it is always confused with links, which are usually underlines. Not convinced? Try to find a book, newspaper, or magazine that underlines text. That look is mostly associated with supermarket tabloids. Politicians, for some reason, love to use underlines instead of italics. We must save them from themselves. Giving laypeople the option to underline text in the WYSIWYG editor is like giving a bottle of whisky to a group of fifteen-year-old boys. No good can come of it. Please remove the option from the editor. Or allow us Admins to turn it off for all WYSIWYG panels on the account. ----------------- MORE ----------------- In a printed document, don’t underline. Ever. It’s ugly and it makes text harder to read. See for yourself— Underlining is another dreary typewriter habit. Typewriters had no bold or italic styling. So the only way to emphasize text was to back up the carriage and type underscores beneath the text. It was a workaround for shortcomings in typewriter technology. Neither your word processor nor your web browser suffers from these shortcomings. If you feel the urge to underline, use bold or italic instead. In special situations, like headings, you can also consider using all caps, small caps, or changing the point size. Not convinced? I invite you to find a book, newspaper, or magazine that underlines text. That look is mostly associated with supermarket tabloids. If that’s the impression you want to make with your writing, by all means, use underlining. If not, don’t. BY THE WAY: • Another reason underlining looks worse than bold or italic: underlining is mechanically applied by the word processor. Bold and italic styles are specially designed to match the basic roman style of the font. • The “track changes” feature of your word processor will underline text added to the document. This is fine. In fact, it’s another reason not to use underlining for emphasis—so readers don’t confuse text that’s marked as a revision with text that happens to be underlined. • On the web, hyperlinks have traditionally been underlined. But email lost its hyphen, and the internet lost its capitalization. Consistent with those signs of maturity, I think it’s time to move beyond underlined hyperlinks too. • “Oh come on! Everyone underlines links!” Some who don’t: the New York Times, New York magazine, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, Google, Amazon, Apple, GitHub, and Wikipedia. Even eBay, paragon of ’90s website design, has relented. Is underlining links dead? Maybe not quite. Dying? For sure.

Share this post

Be the first to comment

How would you tag this suggestion?
Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.